Total Pageviews

Like us on Facebook

Monday, May 2, 2016

Embarrassing: Trillanes gets lectured that a waiver & an SPA are the same ~SHARE~


Oh my GOD, Trillanes is really being shamed by his own actions. Imagine, now he is being lectured that a waiver and an SPA (Special Power of Attorney) is one and the same.  Worse is that it is now revealed that he even did not bother to read the waiver and made comments about something he did not even read.

78 comments:

  1. Does MATALAW even know what he's doing? Omigosh! He should have brought his 64 consultants paid at least P71th/ month to help him understand cguro.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MATALAW means a coward person. duwag

      Delete
    2. It's not the waiver we are all expecting, it's not even the waiver that Duterte has been talking.

      Just an interview today with Duterte who said he will never give a waiver to Trillanes. So SPA is totally different from a bank waiver.

      Duterte refuses to sign waiver, says won't fall into trap of 'askal' Trillanes:
      http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/564864/news/nation/duterte-refuses-to-sign-waiver-says-won-t-fall-into-trap-of-askal-trillanes

      Delete
    3. However you look at it, Trillanes was proven to be WRONG as he cant prove at all the exact 211M in the account which even the BPI themselves attested!!! Should the people demand his withdraw as he promised!!!The Filipinos are so used to this kind of dirty play in politics...ENOUGH AND NO MORE!!!lets all consider our generations future...DUTERTE and FEDERALISM po...lets give Him full support because at the end of the day...its all FOR US!!!

      Delete
    4. Chismoso nga po kasi. Gustong sumikat, kaso sumadsad.

      Delete
  2. He is a lawyer. He has to defend his client. Maybe Trillanes won't expose this kung hindi totoo. I can see his sincerety.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you. Trillanes is gullible. His dishonesty is getting the better of him

      Delete
    2. remember the oakwood mutiny? pakitang gilas laman ito ni Trillanes kasi nangungulilat sa survey.

      Delete
    3. maybe just maybe...sa tingin mo ba lahat ng nag expose eh totoo basta nakikita mo ung sincerity? wth is going on here in th Philippines?There are so many gullible people these days...

      Delete
    4. You can see his sincerity. Can you also see his stupidity? It's quite glaring mate.

      Delete
    5. "Sincerety" do you even know the meaning and its real spelling...o come on!

      Delete
    6. hahaha... sincerity for his ambition, that is!

      Delete
    7. Yeah. He would defend his client because he is Duterte's attorney.
      But he is also very clear about the waiver thing that Trillianes mentions that Duterte didn't issue. Which it turns out he did through SPA. And the bank even confirmed that such amount didn't exist in Duterte's transaction in any sort of way. So they (Duterte's camp) requests BPI to certify it which needs 7-day approval. Making the Trillianes' allegations false.

      He may or not be sincere, but I think with all the information about this episode, Trillianes made a mistake.

      For starters, he said in his affidavit. He met Joseph de Mesa (which he barely know) on April 21, 2016. That is a few days before he announced it to the public. Now, he also used a word "vetted" which means, thoroughly investigated. Don't you think a few days investigation is too short?
      Plus the affidavit is based on a hearsay due Josepth de Mesa as the one who have information which he got from a unnamed relative.

      Delete
    8. Hahaha, i hope you change that habit of yours. Hope that it change and be filled with a healthy dose of skeptisism. :)

      Delete
    9. pag lalabas ka nang isang allegation talagang maging sincere ka dahil hindi ka papaniwalaan with doc facts or evidence... kahit naman ako siguro pag sinungaling ako talagang ipakita ko na sincere ako... kaya wala yan si trillanes. binibilog lang ang taong bayan para hindi iboto si duterte.. solid duterte pa rin..

      Delete
    10. Oh come on. He is smart (trillanes), you know kung mag lalaro kayo ng poker, huli ka na sa bluff nya. talo ka na bankrupt ka pa. hnd mo sxa kilala, at hnd ko sxa kilala kaya wag mong sabihing sincere sxa dahil sa isang video na un . baka proud . Proud na may pinanghahawakan sxang document. Pero ngayong nagcounter na ung binabanatan nya e wala na. Isip isip nga muna bago mag comment o di kaya makisabay na lng sa flow ng halalan. Ngayon na lng nagsilabasan mga documents na malapit na may 9 e. ano yan pahabol ? hahaha .

      Delete
    11. So many people today especially trillanes does not understand what is a waiver and an affidavit. It is really a shame because trillanes keeps on barking yet he does not know that Duterte's Lawyer already executed the waiver to check all transaction and the current balance of Duterte's account if there is really an existing 211 million but to no avail, they are branded as ignorant of the law. This is very funny because it is clear here that trillanes and all the ignorant people opposed to duterte does not realized that the waiver was already sign by duterte in the form of Special Power of Attorney or SPA giving powers to his lawyer to act on dutertes behalf to sign the waiver. My goodness you people must go back to grade one

      Delete
    12. Only in the Philippines, a coward Trillanes, who tried to bring the country down, becomes a Senator. Other countries, he would have been shot or put in prison for a long time.

      Delete
    13. It's not the waiver we are all expecting, it's not even the waiver that Duterte has been talking.

      Just an interview today with Duterte who said he will never give a waiver to Trillanes. So SPA is totally different from a bank waiver. This atty thought we're all dumb.

      Duterte refuses to sign waiver, says won't fall into trap of 'askal' Trillanes:
      http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/564864/news/nation/duterte-refuses-to-sign-waiver-says-won-t-fall-into-trap-of-askal-trillanes

      Delete
  3. How certain can you get when narinig mo lang kay kwan na narinig nya din kay kwan ang story line mo.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How certain can you get when narinig mo lang kay kwan na narinig nya din kay kwan ang story line mo.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pain..bait..and trillanes took it...it was all for free advertising thru bad publicity coz at the end of it is a positive result...kun totoong me joseph demesa hindi naisip ni trillanes na malamang plan o utis ni duterte yun na magleak ng ganyang impormasyon para mas lalong pag usapan siya?....and trillanes was presented with fake documents....tsk tsk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. agree ako dito! Lahat nang issue ke Mayor ay part nang strategy nya.. :) Eh kumakagat naman sila, ayan tuloy lalong syang pinag uusapan, at consistent ang paggiging top nya sa survey..

      Delete
    2. At pano ka nakasisiguro na plano at utos ni duterte yun? Kung makapambintang naman... Tsktsktsk all u have is all speculation... If you cant say anything nice might as well shut up you're just adding salt to a wound...

      Delete
    3. At pano ka nakasisiguro na plano at utos ni duterte yun? Kung makapambintang naman... Tsktsktsk all u have is all speculation... If you cant say anything nice might as well shut up you're just adding salt to a wound...

      Delete
    4. It's not the waiver we are all expecting, it's not even the waiver that Duterte has been talking.

      Just an interview today with Duterte who said he will never give a waiver to Trillanes. So SPA is totally different from a bank waiver.

      Duterte refuses to sign waiver, says won't fall into trap of 'askal' Trillanes:
      http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/564864/news/nation/duterte-refuses-to-sign-waiver-says-won-t-fall-into-trap-of-askal-trillanes

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bubuksan na nga po yung account di ba? BPI ang nang hingi ng 4-7 days hindi duterte camp dahil may sinusunod silang protocols.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. pakinggan mo muna yun sinabi sa interview Jhun Gamaitan, Tanga Ka?

      Delete
    4. hindi po bubuksan ang account kundi humingi ng certification ang DU30 camp na walang 211M ang nasa account. so kahit mayroong 211.02M ang nanduon sa record ay certified na 'no 211M' pa din ang icertify.

      pero hindi naman eto ang issue dapat kundi ang history account dahil dito sa account na eto ay alegedly 1.7B ang mayroong transaction history. sa 3 accounts kasi ay may total na 2.4Billion.

      kaya panalo sila Digong dito sa issue na eto dahil ayaw nilang buksan ang buong transaction history na kasama duon ang 211.?M nung 2014 na di kasama sa SALN.

      Delete
    5. Sabi nga Cumulutive, Collective or if there is ever any amount totalling more or equal to. Bobo nagkakalat ka pa ng tsismis. PI mo.

      Delete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  8. If we will choose and evil. Its better to choose the less one.why they arenjust focusing in one person. Let us request to open all bank account of the presidential candidates and VP candidates. This is one of the strategy of black propaganda.Duterte for president

    ReplyDelete
  9. If we will choose and evil. Its better to choose the less one.why they arenjust focusing in one person. Let us request to open all bank account of the presidential candidates and VP candidates. This is one of the strategy of black propaganda.Duterte for president

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not the waiver we are all expecting, it's not even the waiver that Duterte has been talking.

      Just an interview today with Duterte who said he will never give a waiver to Trillanes. So SPA is totally different from a bank waiver. This atty thought we're all dumb.

      Duterte refuses to sign waiver, says won't fall into trap of 'askal' Trillanes:
      http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/564864/news/nation/duterte-refuses-to-sign-waiver-says-won-t-fall-into-trap-of-askal-trillanes

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. MARUNONG. MARANGAL DISENTE DITO KAYO LALO DAPAT MAGIINGAT MGA KABABAYAN DAHIL ANG MGA TAONG DEMONYO UTAK HINDI MAGAANYONG LOBO SA HARAPAN NYO KUNDI MAGBIBIHIS SYA NG PARANG MABAIT NA TUPA NGUNIT ANG LAYUNIN NYA'Y KAININ KANG BUO KAHIT ITLOG AT BITUKA MO UBOS...

    ReplyDelete
  14. Bakit nawala lahat na comment ni Jhun Gatmaitan?

    ReplyDelete
  15. IGNORANCE OF THE LAW EXCUSES NO ONE. AND YET, TRILLANES BELIEVED HE IS ABOVE THE LAWS. NO WONDER HE BETRAYED AFP, HIS PLEDGE OF LOYALTY AND THE FILIPINO PEOPLE WHO PAID HIM HIS SALARY AND ALLOWANCES PLUS PDAF.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kinalaban nya ang AFP at si GMA dahil sa corruption. Nakulong sya dahil obviously walang laban. Pero dahil sa kanila madaming general ang natanggal at nakulong, nagpakamatay pa si Gen. Reyes. Nakulong din si GMA. Eventually panalo ang pinaglalaban ng Magdalo.

      Number 1 most productive in the senate. Deserve nya ang maraming consultants na sinasabing madaming pinapasahod ( allowed sa allowance of each senator ).

      At the Senate, he is one of the most productive senators in terms of number bills, resolutions and committee reports filed,[26] totalling to 1,109 bills and resolutions, 56 of which have been passed into law from 2007 to present.[1]
      During the 16th Congress (2013–present) he ranks 1st[27] based on the total number of:
      National Bills passed into law (as Principal Author) (7 bills)
      National Bills passed into law (as Principal Sponsor) (9 bills)
      Committee Reports filed (32 bills) 9 have been passed into law; 13 have been approved on 3rd reading; 10 are pending for deliberations
      During the 15th Congress (2010-2013) he ranked 1st[27] based on the total number of:
      National Bills (as Principal Sponsor) passed into law
      National Bills (as Principal Author) passed into law (15th Congress)

      Delete
  16. Sincerity?Para ngang may halong guilt. Try to look at his eyes. Look closely. If he is really true to his word,bakit di sxa makatingin nga dretso sa mga nag interview sa kanya? Just my thought

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not the waiver we are all expecting, it's not even the waiver that Duterte has been talking.

      Just an interview today with Duterte who said he will never give a waiver to Trillanes. So SPA is totally different from a bank waiver. This atty thought we're all dumb.

      Duterte refuses to sign waiver, says won't fall into trap of 'askal' Trillanes:
      http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/564864/news/nation/duterte-refuses-to-sign-waiver-says-won-t-fall-into-trap-of-askal-trillanes

      Delete
  17. If the documents are fake the story is fake also...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Please explain how the waiver and the affidavit is the same in this instance?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He didnt say affidavit. He said waiver and SPA.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. I like your question, I for one also does not think that they are the same in this instance.

      Delete
    4. I like your question, I for one also does not think that they are the same in this instance.

      Delete
    5. of course you won't think that they are the same since

      HINDI NAMAN PO YUN YUNG SINABI, ANO BA YAN

      ang sabi nung abogado, yung "Waiver" AND "SPA" ang magkapareho

      Delete
  19. Waiver,affidavit and SPA are three different things! Atty. Panelo thinks most people are class C and E or iskwateroo!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Waiver and SPA maybe different but can also be the same. it really depends on the content of the SPA. In Atty. Panelo's SPA it has all the element of a waiver.

      Delete
  20. Asked a young kid what they were taught about profession. Doctors,too expensive daw, nurse, mababa sahod, lawyers, liar daw, of course not all, ang tamaan bato bato lang

    ReplyDelete
  21. Trillianes doesn't even know the basic law. He ia ignorant to the law. Sincerity is different from stupidity and being a dumb puppet by cojuangco-aquino oligarchy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. Pakawala lang si Trillanes ng administration to disrupt Duterte's success and boost Roxas' rating. If he is really sincere, he should have done it earlier at hindi lang dapat si Duterte, lahat ng presidentiables and vice presidentiables including himself para magkaalaman na kung sino talaga ang walang tinatagong baho. Hay... Why so stupid Trillanes?

      Delete
  22. no no no.. iba ang affidavit sa waiver.. kahit igoogle niyo.. :) you're welcome..

    affidavit is a written document signed by a person who promises that what is written therein is true. under oath kumbaga while ang waiver naman po is an act of giving up a right or requirement. a waiver can only be called as an affidavit if it is under oath or affirmed under notary public or other authorized officer. therefore, a waiver can be an affidavit but affidavit is not limited to waiver only (example: affidavit of loss, affidavit of desistance, etc.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hindi naman po kasi waiver at affidavit and sinabing magkapareho, intindihin mo muna yung pinapanood mo

      yun sinabi ng abogado ang magkapareho ay yung "WAIVER" at yung "SPA" na hawak nya

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  23. Trillianes " evidence " is non existent in his affidavit. The name he mentioned did not even make any sworn statement on information they allegedly have.

    In my opinion it is clearly a political hatchet job. The stunt was timed so close to the election hoping it will do serious damage to DUTERTE from which he cannot recover, and the truth be damned. It looks like it backfired again big time!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Correct. And BPI said they will issue a statement within 7 days. By that time tapos na election. Panalo na si Duterte..moot and academic..

    ReplyDelete
  25. The bank itself said there is no duterte account with that kind of money, end of discussion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Politics nowadays is like a circus,ang daming pasikat, ang daming nagmamagaling , ang daming pretender. I would rather watch a mime in action than a puppet talking.

      Delete
    2. The bank never released a statement yet so it's not true, it's said by atty himself.

      Delete
    3. It's not the waiver we are all expecting, it's not even the waiver that Duterte has been talking.

      Just an interview today with Duterte who said he will never give a waiver to Trillanes. So SPA is totally different from a bank waiver. This atty thought we're all dumb.

      Duterte refuses to sign waiver, says won't fall into trap of 'askal' Trillanes:
      http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/564864/news/nation/duterte-refuses-to-sign-waiver-says-won-t-fall-into-trap-of-askal-trillanes

      Delete
  26. I don't think Duterte will plan such things like sending that de mesa guy to make a roar on his side. He is not that damn to do that. I think that that is not his cup of tea. You better think again guys.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I don't think Duterte will plan such things like sending that de mesa guy to make a roar on his side. He is not that damn to do that. I think that that is not his cup of tea. You better think again guys.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Politics nowadays is like a circus,ang daming pasikat, ang daming nagmamagaling , ang daming pretender. I would rather watch a mime in action than a puppet talking.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Politics nowadays is like a circus,ang daming pasikat, ang daming nagmamagaling , ang daming pretender. I would rather watch a mime in action than a puppet talking.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Politics nowadays is like a circus,ang daming pasikat, ang daming nagmamagaling , ang daming pretender. I would rather watch a mime in action than a puppet talking.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Atty magkaiba na naman ang sinasabi nyo ni Digong. Sabi nya sa interview today ay never na syang magbigay ng waiver kay Trillanes at sabi mo 'you brought two (2) documents, first one is a waiver and the spa, then sabi mo pareho lang ang waiver at spa iisa lang yun. so ano yung 2 documents? Lol

    Eto ang news na hindi yun ang waiver na inexpect ng lahat. Sinungaling lang etong si atty. Nagkabuhol-buhol ulit kayo kagaya nung nakaraan na panay ang tanggi at denial ng spokesman ni Digong na non existing yung BPI account pero sa kabilang interview ay inamin naman ni Digong.
    Duterte refuses to sign waiver, says won't fall into trap of 'askal' Trillanes -
    http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/564864/news/nation/duterte-refuses-to-sign-waiver-says-won-t-fall-into-trap-of-askal-trillanes

    History ng bank account ang hinihingi ni Trillanes sa waiver at hindi 1 specific figure. hindi yan ang bank waiver na tinutukoy ng lahat, playing safe lang kayo attorney. Si Digong ang humamon kay Trillanes na bubuksan nya ang account if mayroong affidavit. Pero iba na naman ngayon ang condition nyo at hindi nyo nabuksan ang account kundi
    yung specific amount na hinihingi nyo sa bank na ang 211M ang icertify na wala, generally ang 211.1M or kahit anong butal ay of course certified na there's no 211M kahit mayroong 211.1M, 211.001M, etc.
    Wise talaga kayo at madami na naman kayong mapapasakay na mangmang. Sige na kayo na ang mga matatalino. Di naman kami hihingi sa pera nyo. Lol

    Bakit kasi mas pinahirapan nyo pa ang bank sa condition na icertify ng whole number. List lang naman ng history account at hindi yung naka round-off na number. Mayroon lang talaga kayong tinatagong transaction record. Ang mga katunggali nyo ay nagsign na ng bank waiver na walang condition.
    Pero nakakatawa pala na pwedeng humingi ng certification na there's no amount of 99.9 as such in my account so kung 99.8 ang nasa account ko ay certified na 'no amount' nga.

    Naisahan nyo ulit si Trillanes. Panalo ang mga sinungaling at paiba iba statement. Pero di pa natatapos dito. Lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm confused sir "Baguhin ang Pilipinas" , are PRO or ANTI DU30? your logo is for DU30 while your statements are against him

      Delete
    2. I'm confused sir "Baguhin ang Pilipinas" , are you PRO or ANTI DU30? your logo is for DU30 while your statements are against him

      Delete